[bhamlaxy]

REGISTER TO REMOVE THIS AD

But then if the poor can't afford the food, help them grow the food.

On a domestic US level, it is sort of difficult for the low-class urban working poor to grow their own food.

On a global level, I definitely agree. That's one of the primary calls for action right now, that we need to increase the independence of poorer countries when it comes to food.

[Blackie]

this is kind of a no brainer


energy crisis: life as we know it would be degraded horribly but we would still be alive

food crises: most of us would die

see my point k

[Moshineko]

Originally Posted by Blackie

this is kind of a no brainer


energy crisis: life as we know it would be degraded horribly but we would still be alive

food crises: most of us would die

see my point k

Pas de tout, my friend.

Energy crisis: life as rich First-worlders know it would be degraded horribly. Developing nations would be crippled, undeveloped nations would have to start developing again from scratch.

Food Crisis: Rich First-worlders pay a bit more for food, everyone else starves.

Which do you think will be more likely now?

[Blackie]

actually i didnt read the original post i thought that the debate was about "which one is worse" or something sorry

[nairb168]

Originally Posted by bhamlaxy

On a domestic US level, it is sort of difficult for the low-class urban working poor to grow their own food.

On a global level, I definitely agree. That's one of the primary calls for action right now, that we need to increase the independence of poorer countries when it comes to food.

True about on the domestic level; I was thinking more about global.