|

03-02-2008, 10:36 AM
Wow look at the flames....
I hate politics. -_-
Oh, and for the whole evolution topic, I think it is a load of hypotheses supported only by assumptions.
Consider dogs, didn't poodles evolve from ancient dogs? I'm fairly certain that prehistoric dogs looked like lapdogs. So there was a change. Evolution, right? Nope. It was only a narrowing of the gene pool. The genes that told the cells to grow large pointy teeth or whatever were lost. No new information was gained.
For micro-organisms to form men, however, an entirely different kind of change is necessary. You need to gain more information. Genes that tell cells to form tiny squishy blobs cannot be morphed to carry electronic charges from a cephalized (sp?) area to other parts of the body. One might attribute this to mutations. That doesn't work either. One bacteria (e. something not sure the name, but seriously I'm not pulling this out of my ass) mutates to survive medicine. The medicine used to combat the bacteria screws with an enzyme the bacteria produces to make it kill itself. The mutated bacteria do not form this enzyme at all for them to survive. Again, that's a lose of information.
Did anyone actually read that? 0.o
Last edited by Ninjer-sauce; 03-02-2008 at 10:52 AM.
|